Categories: Insights, Case Law


3 Dec 2015

European Court of Justice: interpretation of the directive on collective redundancies

The Court of Justice of the European Union, with sentence no. C-422/14 of 11 November 2015, intervened on two central points of the European directive on collective redundancies (98/59/EC). In this case (i) the calculation criteria for company size which makes the law governing collective redundancies applicable and (ii) the notion of redundancy useful for determining the numeric limit above which the directive on collective redundancies applies. In terms of the first point, the Court observed that, for the purposes of calculating the number of employees for application of the directive on collective redundancies, that workers employed for a fixed term form part of “normally employed workers”. In terms of the second point, the Court established that for the calculation of the five redundancies “any termination of the employment contract not desired by the worker and, thus, without his consent” is considered a redundancy, including resignations submitted by an employee due to unilateral changes made by the employer to an essential element of the employment contract for reasons not related to that individual worker. The impact of this ruling on Italian law will be mitigated in terms of the first point, since the Jobs Act requires that the calculation of employees . for the purposes of applying any legal or contractual provision – must take into account workers employed under a contract for a fixed term, by applying a specific calculation criteria (article 27 Legislative Decree 81/2015). The repercussions regarding the second point could be significant, since dismissals, according to our laws, even if for “just cause” have always been excluded from the calculation of the numeric threshold for application of the aforesaid law.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…