Categories: Insights, Case Law


27 Aug 2017

Five-year statute of limitations on contributions credit

The Court of Lodi, with judgement No. 99 filed on 6 July 2017, verified that the statute of limitations applied to a credit on a tax payment notice. Specifically, a company that had filed a written appeal registered in February 2017 and duly notified to INAIL, went to Court so as it could declare the credit related to a tax payment slip notified in May 2004 subjected to the statute of limitations. At the outcome of the proceedings, the Judge in charge of the case deemed the request of the petitioning party well grounded, referring to the recent judgement of the Plenary Sitting of the Court of Cassation. The latter, to settle the dispute on the matter, declared that the statute of limitations on contributions is five years even in the case of absence of opposition to the payment notice (judgement No. 23397 dated 17 November 2016). The Plenary Sitting in fact, noted that the deadline – peremptory without challenge – to file an opposition to a payment notice as per article 24, paragraph 5 of Italian Legislative Decree No. 46 dated 1999, even if causing the impossibility to file an appeal, only produces the substantial effect of the irrevocability of the contributions credit without causing also the so-called “conversion” of the brief statute of limitations (in this case, five years, according to article 3, paragraphs 9 and 10, of Italian Law No. 335 dated 1995) into the ordinary one (ten years), pursuant to article  2953 of Italian Civil Code. The latter applies only if the judicial order has become final, while the aforementioned notice, being administrative in nature, does not meet the requirements to acquire a res judicata effect. Based on what was ruled by the Plenary Sitting, the Court stated that the statute of limitations has never been interrupted by the Agency, thus ruling in favour of the appealing company with assignment of compensation of legal expenses.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…