Categories: Insights, Case Law


27 Aug 2017

Five-year statute of limitations on contributions credit

The Court of Lodi, with judgement No. 99 filed on 6 July 2017, verified that the statute of limitations applied to a credit on a tax payment notice. Specifically, a company that had filed a written appeal registered in February 2017 and duly notified to INAIL, went to Court so as it could declare the credit related to a tax payment slip notified in May 2004 subjected to the statute of limitations. At the outcome of the proceedings, the Judge in charge of the case deemed the request of the petitioning party well grounded, referring to the recent judgement of the Plenary Sitting of the Court of Cassation. The latter, to settle the dispute on the matter, declared that the statute of limitations on contributions is five years even in the case of absence of opposition to the payment notice (judgement No. 23397 dated 17 November 2016). The Plenary Sitting in fact, noted that the deadline – peremptory without challenge – to file an opposition to a payment notice as per article 24, paragraph 5 of Italian Legislative Decree No. 46 dated 1999, even if causing the impossibility to file an appeal, only produces the substantial effect of the irrevocability of the contributions credit without causing also the so-called “conversion” of the brief statute of limitations (in this case, five years, according to article 3, paragraphs 9 and 10, of Italian Law No. 335 dated 1995) into the ordinary one (ten years), pursuant to article  2953 of Italian Civil Code. The latter applies only if the judicial order has become final, while the aforementioned notice, being administrative in nature, does not meet the requirements to acquire a res judicata effect. Based on what was ruled by the Plenary Sitting, the Court stated that the statute of limitations has never been interrupted by the Agency, thus ruling in favour of the appealing company with assignment of compensation of legal expenses.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…