Categories: Insights


29 Apr 2015

PENSIONS AND THE RULING OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE

With its ruling no. 70 of 30 April 2015, the Constitutional Court declared article 24, paragraph 25 of Italian Legislative Decree 201/2011 (so-called Manovra Salva-Italia), converted by Italian Law no. 214/2011 illegitimate, specifically the part which had frozen revaluation of pensions of amounts greater than 1,700 euro gross for the 2012-2013 two year period. According to the Court, with this provision, “the limits of reasonableness and proportionality have been crossed, with consequent detriment to the acquired right to a pension and with irreparable damage to the expectations legitimately held by the worker regarding retirement". Therefore affected retirees must be awarded a revaluation for the aforesaid period based on the original law. However, the day after this ruling, INPS (Italian Social Security) promptly explained with message no. 3135/2015 that any requests for re-establishment of pensions submitted for this purpose will not be granted for the time being, because of a lack of specific coverage as per article 81, paragraph 4, of the Italian Constitution. INPS has thus bought time and turned the problem over to the Government so it can adopt the appropriate legal initiatives. And an initial, although partial, prompt response from the Government did not fail to raise issues, particularly with trade unions. Last 18 May the Government gave the green light to a law decree on pensions, in an attempt to modify the obligations to reimburse the involved retirees. Specifically, in the decree published on 21 May 2015 in the Official Gazette and now waiting to be converted into law by the Parliament, a complete reimbursement is allowed for the lower pensions involved and a progressively decreasing one down to zero for pensions equal to 3,200 euro gross per month.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…