Categories: Insights, Case Law


28 Jan 2018

Punitive consequences for late claims

The Court of Cassation in its Plenary Sitting, with judgement No. 30985/2017 resolved a conflict of case-law regarding the penalty in the case of disciplinary dismissal affected by a late claim of unlawfulness. The controversy from which the judgement of the Plenary Sitting emerged, arose from an appeal filed at the court by an employee in disagreement with the dismissal for just cause ordered as the implementation of disciplinary proceedings initiated approximately 2 years after the employer became aware of the facts charged to him. Case law presented two contrasting interpretations. According to the first interpretation, the late claim did not have substantial value in terms of employer’s right of withdrawal, thus triggering the indemnification protection as per article 18, paragraph 5 of the Workers’ Charter. The second interpretation deems the immediacy of the dismissal order a fundamental element of the employer’s right of withdrawal, with consequent application of the reintegration protection pursuant to article 18, paragraph 4, of the Workers’ Charter. The Plenary Sitting of the Court chose to adhere – at the end of lengthy proceedings – to the first interpretation, stating the following law principle: “The judgement concerning disciplinary dismissal following the occurrence of a significant and unjustified delay in issuing the claim related to the charge leading to the dismissal and falling “ratione temporis” under the provisions of article 18 of the law No. 300 dated 1970, as amended by paragraph 42 of article 1 of the law No. 92 dated 28.6.2012, gives rise to the application of the indemnification penalty as established in the fifth paragraph of article 18 of the law No. 300/1970”. This means that, upon the occurrence of unlawful dismissal due to a late claim, full indemnification protection shall apply, which means a reimbursement in favour of the interested employee, without prejudice to the termination of the employment relationship, in an amount ranging from 12 to 24 monthly pay based on the last total salary paid.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

6 Feb 2026

Pay equity and transparency: draft implementing decree presented

Italy is among the first Member States to have adopted the draft implementing legislative decree of EU Directive 2023/970, which yesterday received its initial approval from the Council…

30 Jan 2026

A conviction for stalking can justify dismissal for just cause

With Ordinance No. 32952 of 17 December 2025, the Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, ruled that a final conviction for stalking and abuse can justify dismissal for just…

30 Jan 2026

We continue to be a Great Place to Work!

For the third consecutive year, De Luca & Partners has been awarded the prestigious Great Place to Work® certification, a significant recognition of the value we place on…

29 Jan 2026

Italian Supreme Court: Employer Monitoring and the Use of Corporate Chats for Disciplinary Purposes

Corporate chats “intended for work-related communications by employees accessing them through company accounts constitute work tools, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 2, of Law No. 300 of 1970,…

28 Jan 2026

Anti-union conduct: the Supreme Court moves beyond formalism and focuses on substance

With order no. 789 of 14 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of anti-union conduct by employers in relation to information and consultation obligations on…

27 Jan 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the use of artificial intelligence may justify a dismissal for objective justified reason?

With Judgment No. 9135 of November 19, 2025, the Labour Section of the Court of Rome held that the dismissal for objective justified reason (i.e. “giustificato motivo oggettivo”,…