Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Feb 2018

The burden of proving the achievement of the objectives to receive payment of the related bonus rests on the employee

In Judgment no. 1712/2017, the Milan Court of Appeal has dealt with the issue of the omission by the employer of the annual objectives linked to the payment of a bonus. In this case, in the Court’s opinion, the employee claiming payment of the bonus is encumbered with the burden of “… producing and proving his achievement of the objectives that, according to the principles of fairness and good faith in performing a contract, should have been reasonably assigned with a view of continuity with previously set objectives and in relation to the company potential and contingent market conditions”. This is so because the omission in question constitutes contract breach, since the employer is obliged to assign the annual objectives, and does not fall within the scope of application of Article 1359, Italian Civil Code (relied on in the case at hand by the worker) according to which “the condition (editor’s note: achievement of the objectives linked to payment of the bonus) should be considered fulfilled if this was missing for reasons attributable to the party that had no interest in the fulfilment thereof.” This provision – according to the Court – shall apply only in case of a future and uncertain event, on the occurrence of which the effectiveness of an agreement depends. This is so when an employer that has assigned the objectives has engaged in a conduct that prevents workers from achieving them; nevertheless, also in this case, the worker should prove not only the interest of the employer against fulfilment of the condition but also that the objective would have been achieved had the employer not thwarted it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…