Categories: Insights, Case Law


29 Jan 2017

The employer’s decisions in dismissal for justified objective grounds are unquestionable

The Court of Cassation, with judgment No. 25201 dated 7 December 2016, issued a new judgement on the matter of dismissal for justified objective grounds. In particular, the Court of Cassation noted that Article 3 of Law 604/66 does not require that “adverse situations” or situations entailing “considerable extraordinary expenses” must be invoked as the basis of dismissal for justified objective grounds. Rather, it requires the presence of productive reasons related to the organization of work that may hinder its operation. In this sense, to legitimize this type of dismissal it is sufficient that “the reasons related to the productive activity and the organization of work, among which it is not possible to exclude those aimed at a more efficient management or an increase in profitability of the company, result in an actual organizational change through the suppression of a specific job position“. This interpretation, in fact, does not radically change the regulatory framework established by law 604/66 but, instead, fits perfectly within it, thus giving full effect to the provisions of article 41 of the Constitution which expressly establishes the right of an entrepreneur to create, in the implementation of the business activity, efficiency in the way that is deemed best suited to the management of the enterprise.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…