Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Dismissal, giusta causa, Licenziamento


23 Jul 2017

The procedural guarantees referred to in Art. 7 of the Workers’ Charter are also applied to disciplinary dismissal of a senior executive

With its decision no. 15204 of 20 June 2017, the Court of Cassation intervened in the subject of the disciplinary dismissal of a senior executive without prior application of the procedure referred to in Art. 7 of Italian Law no. 300/1970. The Supreme Court referred to some recent pronouncements, including Plenary Sitting decisions (Cass. No. 2553 of 10 February 2015, Cass. Plen. Sit. No. 7880 of 6-30 March 2007) and clarified that “the procedural guarantees laid down under Art. 7 of Italian Law no. 300/1970 are an expression of the principle of general basic guarantees safeguarding all forms of disciplinary dismissal”, which is applied to all forms of subordinate employment, without making a distinction between employees whatever their position in the hierarchy. A different kind of interpretation would be in contrast with the courts’ decisions on the application of the law, because it would revive “an old and hackneyed notion of a senior executive as an alter ego of the entrepreneur”, and would be in breach of the principle of “audiatur et altera pars”, as a worker’s indefectible guarantee. The Court maintained, moreover, that senior executives are expressly included in the listings in Art. 2095 of the Italian Civil Code and, as such, are included in the regulations governing employees in general. By failing to implement the procedural guarantees referred to in Art.7, the resulting claims will be those laid down in collective labour agreements for unjustified dismissal (payment of an indemnity in lieu of notice and of a supplementary indemnity).

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…