Categories: Insights, Case Law


1 May 2018

The right to have access to the records throughout the disciplinary procedure

With its judgement No. 7581 of 27 March 2018, the Court of Cassation has once again dealt with the delicate subject of the so-called right to have access to the records within a disciplinary procedure. In the case at issue, the judges ruling on the merits of the case held the dismissal notified to an employee to be unlawful. The employee had attended hearings for legal traineeship purposes, on days on which the employee proved to be absent for illness or present at work. In order to ground his own complaint, the employee claimed the employer’s refusal to make the documentation grounding the charge available, which was necessary in order to be able to correctly exercise the respective right of defence, since the facts dated back to the past and concerned occasional behaviours such as to prevent him from remembering the specific episodes. In upholding the ruling on the merits of the case, the Court stressed that, even if article 7 of Law No. 300/1970 did not weigh an obligation upon the employer to make the documentation available to the employee, against whom a disciplinary formal notice had been brought and on which the latter is based, the employer “must offer the consultation of the company documents to the person charged, where the examination of any such documents is necessary for the purpose of allowing the opposite party to have an appropriate defence, based on the principles of fairness and good faith in the performance of the contract”. The stance put forward fully complies with the principle pursuant to which the employee’s right of defence must not be limited within the scope of a disciplinary procedure, subject to the unlawfulness of the notified dismissal, if any.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…