Categories: Insights, Case Law


27 Sep 2016

Transfer of business even if in the case of sole transfer or personnel – applicability of the double limitation period of appeal upon formal communication

The Court of Busto Arsizio with judgement No. 264 dated 12 July 2016, stated that the law principle according to which a transfer of business pursuant to art. 2112 of the Italian civil code exists also when transferring, without moving materials or assets, personnel between the transferor and the transferee, even if the personnel is not highly specialized and whose activity is unskilled labour, provided that the financial organisation coincides with the workers’ organisation. In the same ruling, the Court noted that although Article 32 of the Law 183/2013 (the so called "Collegato Lavoro"), paragraph 4 letter c) extended the limitation terms of the provisions related to dismissals "upon transfer of employment contracts occurred in accordance with art. 2112 of the Italian Civil Code with term effective from the transfer date", it is also clear that the double limitation period (60 days for an out-of-court appeal and 180 days for the filing of the appeal) applies only when there is a formal written notice of the transfer of business. Therefore, in cases such as the present one where "the existence of a transfer of business unit is controversial (…) no limitation term can be applied."

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…