Categories: Insights, Publications


17 May 2017

“Health and Safety, the disclosure on risks is the responsibility of the employer” (Sole 24 Ore and Il Quotidiano del Lavoro, 18 May 2017 – Vittorio De Luca, Federica Parente)

The law on smart working states that the employer “guarantees” the health and safety of the worker and, for this purpose, provides to him/her as well as to the workers’ safety representative, at least once a year, a written information notice explaining the general and specific risks associated with the particular implementation of the employment relationship. In turn, the worker must cooperate in the implementation of the preventive measures established by the employer. Moreover, the law also calls for the worker who is performing his/her smart working tasks to be covered by INAIL also for accidents occurring during travel from the place of residence to the one selected for performing the work. However, in such a case, the effective coverage of the insurance is subordinate, in addition to the conditions established in the Consolidated Law for compulsory insurance, to the fact that the employee’s choice of the place where to perform the work is dictated by needs associated with the performance of the work itself or the need to reconcile life requirements with work requirements meeting “reasonableness criteria”.

Read here the original version published on Il Sole 24 Ore and  Il Quotidiano del Lavoro.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…