Categories: Insights, Publications


20 Jun 2017

Illicit use of the corporate phone legitimises dismissal for just cause (Il Sole 24 Ore – Il Quotidiano del Lavoro, 21 June 2017 – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Labour section of the Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 4262 dated February 17, 2017, addressed the issue of the lawfulness of dismissal for just cause ordered to an employee holding a middle-management position for the personal use of a mobile phone owned by the employer and provided for business reasons. The Court of Cassation, believing appropriate the ruling of the judges on the matter, excluded the alleged breach of Article 4 of the Workers’ Statute claimed by the employee on the basis of the fact that the employer, in order to ascertain the unlawful conduct, did not use any audiovisual equipment or other equipment designed for remote control of the work activity, but based itself on the results emerged from telephone call logs. In fact, according to the Court, “it is entirely legitimate that the employer, in monitoring its activity, may detect anomalies in the use of assets provided to its employees, such as mobile phones, from which logs, related to voice or data traffic (provided in the invoice, moreover with appropriate omissions and redactions) may lead to detecting anomalies such as to induce the employer to believe that there may be abuses performed by the user of the devices”. The Court of Cassation, therefore, confirmed the full legitimacy of the dismissal ordered, considering the dismissal fully proportionate to the offence committed by the employee.

Read the original version of this article opublished on Il Sole 24 Ore and  Il Quotidiano del Lavoro.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…