Categories: Insights, Do you know that

Tag: CCNL settore metalmeccanico, formazione continua


28 Jan 2019

DO YOU KNOW THAT… Companies in the metalworking and mechanical engineering sector are required to provide continuing professional development courses for their employees every three years?

Since 1 January 2017 companies in the metalworking and mechanical engineering sector have been required, every three years, to provide workers employed under permanent contracts with continuing professional development courses of a duration of 24 hours per participant, within their working hours and according to the procedures identified by Fondimpresa [Italian Inter-Professional Fund for Continuing Professional Development]. The first three-year period for which this measure is applicable will end on 31 December 2019. Safety training is not included in the 24-hour duration. The training initiatives available to workers are predominantly those on which the company, in possible agreement with the RSU [unitary trade union representation], has provided information to its workers. Alternatively, workers can exercise their right to receive training by requesting to participate in training initiatives aimed at the acquisition of transferable, linguistic, digital, technical or managerial knowledge, that can be used in the working context. If workers have still not participated in training courses by the end of the second year (that is, by 31 December 2018 in the initial phase of application), they may exercise their right during the third year (2019) until they have received 24 hours of training. In such cases, 2/3 of the hours taken up by the training initiative chosen by the worker (16 hours) will be scheduled during working hours, and 1/3 of the hours taken up by said training initiative (8 hours) will be scheduled outside of working hours. If the training initiatives involve an attendance fee, the company must cover the costs, up to a maximum of 300 euros, which may also be supplemented with any available public or private funds. In order for workers to take advantage of this subjective right during the third year of the three-year period, they must make a written request within the 10 working days prior to the start of the training activity in which they intend to participate, and – if requested by the company – submit the documentation necessary for exercising such rights. As a rule, 3% of the total workforce employed by the production unit can be absent at the same time in order to participate in training activities, unless otherwise agreed by the company and provided this is in line with the unit’s technical-productive demands. In companies with up to 200 employees, if the application of the aforementioned percentage generates fractional values, they will be rounded up to the nearest whole number. Any unused hours cannot be carried forward into the hours required for the next three-year period, unless they have remained unused due to technical-organisation demands, including cases where the maximum overall percentage for simultaneous absence has been exceeded. Training initiatives shall be duly documented by the provider or company, and registered. Exercise of the subjective right to receive training shall be subject to reporting to the RSU [unitary trade union representation]; any disagreements shall be reviewed jointly by the Management and the RSU.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…