Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: diritto del lavoro, labour law


7 Nov 2023

Minimum wage and parameter assessment

There is no law in the Italian legal system establishing a legal minimum wage. In fact, the parameters for  ‘fair’ pay are defined by the Italian Constitutional Charter.

Specifically, Article 36 of the Italian Constitution states that fair pay is pay which ensures the worker a free and dignified existence and is proportionate to the quantity and quality of the work performed.

This pay is usually quantified by collective bargaining in the relevant sector.

In this regard, the Italian Court of Cassation confirmed in ruling no. 27711 of 2 October 2023 that, in the event that the minimum wage is determined by a legal provision, as in the case of the cooperative sector, ‘fair’ pay must in any event be assessed on the basis of the comparatively most representative collective agreement within the sector of activity or other relevant ‘financial’ information.

In particular, in the aforementioned ruling, the Italian Court of Cassation clarified that the judge, even where there is a rule establishing the minimum wage, in assessing compliance with the constitutional parameters on fair pay, must verify the consistency of that wage also in the light of the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement signed by the most representative employers’ and trade union associations. In the event of a negative outcome, the judge must extend the investigation to other concurrent parameters such as, for example, the financial and statistical indicators used to measure the poverty threshold the ISTAT index (Istituto nazionale di statistica– Italian National Institute of Statistics), the income threshold to qualify for an incapacity pension, or the statistical indicators identified by the Directive (EU) 2022/2041 on adequate minimum wages.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…