Categories: Insights, Legislation


25 Jul 2016

Contracts: Community Law in force from 23 July

On 23 July 2016 Community Law No. 122/2016 came into force containing new rules on the management of personnel in the event of succession of procurement. The legislation replaces Article 29, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree No. 276/2003, which excludes the applicability of the rules of transfer of a company in cases of a contractor taking over from another in the management of the same service. According to EU rules, on the one hand, it is not possible to exclude the safeguarding of employees’ rights in cases of this kind, such as the change of a contract, which are comparable to the transfer of a company; on the other hand, this safeguards the principle that the succession of procurement and the transfer of a company constitute separate situations and, as such, deserve different rules. In that regard, the legislative amendment has identified certain conditions where the above distinction applies. In particular, the acquisition of staff already employed in the contract does not involve the application of the rules of transfer of a company (i) when the takeover in the management of the service takes place in favour of an entity with its own organisational and operating structure, and (ii) where there are elements of discontinuity with the previous contractor which result in a specific identity as a company. The most arduous task will be the responsibility of case-law: identifying the aforesaid elements, on a case-by-case basis.

Leggi qui il testo del decreto.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…