Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: contratto a termine, Decreto Dignità, Jobs Act, offerta di conciliazione, somministrazione


30 Jul 2018

Dignity Decree 2.0

In the past few days, the so called Dignity Decree (Law Decree 87/2018), which came into force on 14 July, was not approved by the Finance and Labour Committees which, during the review session, approved several amendments. With specific reference to the fixed term contract, the new regulations would be applicable to contracts entered into after the effective date of the Decree, as well as renewals and prorogations after 31 October 2018 (the so-called transition clause). Moreover, the Parliamentary Committees have approved, during the review session, the amendment according to which, except a different use of the collective agreement applied by the user, the number of employees hired with fixed term contract or staff leasing fixed term contracts cannot exceed overall 30% of the number of employees with open-ended contract working for the employer. In addition, the Committees have resolved on the introduction of the so called fraudulent staff leasing that takes place whenever the use of staff leased has the purpose of avoiding mandatory laws or collective agreements. Finally, the Committees, with reference to the conciliation model established on art. 6 of the Law Decree 23/2015, has proposed to higher the parameters from a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 27 monthly salaries. Now it is to be seen if the Decree will undergo further amendments at the time of approval.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…