Categories: Insights


14 May 2015

DISMISSALS FOR ECONOMIC GROUNDS AND REINSTATEMENT

Article 3, paragraph 1 of Legislative Decree no. 23/15 establishes that if it is ascertained that the grounds do not exist for dismissal for justified objective motive ”the judge declares the employment terminated on the date of dismissal” and sentences the employer to pay an indemnity equal to two months salary of the last remuneration for the calculation of post-employment benefits for each year of seniority at the company, with a minimum limit of 4 months and maximum limit of 24 months salary. It should be noted that in terms of dismissal for justified objective reason, the law contains an reinstatement obligation, whereby the employer must prove the absence within its organisation of alternative positions for workers who are dismissed due to elimination of their jobs. According to some commenters, this legal position should no longer be applicable for cases of dismissal of workers hired with the so-called contract with increased protection based on seniority and consequently, the reinstatement obligation should only be applicable in cases where the applicable protection is that contained in article 18 of Law 300/70. We feel that it is unlikely that the law will change directions on this, at least for the first years of application of the new regulations.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…