Categories: Insights, Legislation


27 Mar 2019

Green-light to the reform for enterprises in crisis: spotlight on the articles of association and organizational arrangement of Italian-law limited liability companies (S.r.l.)

Some of the measures set forth in Legislative Decree no. 14 of 12 January 2019 and published in the Official Gazette on the following 14 February entered into force on 16 March 2019, implementing delegating law no. 155 of 19 October 2017, and laying down the new “Code of corporate crises and insolvency” (the “Code“).

 

Appointment of control bodies in limited liability companies

Net of a series of implementing provisions to be enacted – and pending the entry into force of most reforms, 18 months from publication in the Official Gazette (and therefore on 14 August 2020) – in accordance with Article 389 of the Code, the entry into force, inter alia, of Article 379 is brought forward. This article, which amends Article 2477 of the Italian Civil Code, governs the “appointment of the control bodies of limited liability companies.”

 

Effective from 16 March 2019, the appointment of a control body or auditor is mandatory if a limited liability company:

  • is obligated to prepare consolidated financial statements;
  • controls a company which is obligated to carry out a statutory audit of the accounts;
  • has exceeded at least one of the following limits for two consecutive financial years:
  1. total assets of € 2 million (as opposed to the previous € 4,400,000),
  2. sales revenues of 2 million euro (as opposed to the previous € 8,800,000),
  • average number of employees in the relevant period: 10 employees (as opposed to the previous 50 employees)

 

The above mandatory appointment ceases if none of the above limits is exceeded for three consecutive financial years.

 

In addition to any other stakeholder, the Registrar of Companies may report infringement of the above so that the control body is appointed ex-officio.

 

It is interesting to note that, as estimated by the Bank of Italy, the limited liability companies that might be concerned by the aforementioned obligation are about 140,000.

 

Therefore, the limited liability companies the articles of association of which:

  • make a generic reference to the “cases/criteria of the law” providing for the mandatory appointment of a control body or auditor, or a generic reference to the parameters pursuant to Article 2477 of the Italian Civil Code shall not be obliged to amend them; whereas
  • make express reference to the parameters pursuant to Article 2435 of the Italian Civil Code, which currently are no longer cross-referenced, shall be obligated to amend them.

 

More in detail, in terms of organizational arrangement (and therefore, in the articles of association) it is possible to select one of the following options:

  • appointment of a sole statutory auditor or board of statutory auditors (vested with the authority to oversee compliance with the law) and of an independent auditor (in charge of the accounting control)
  • appointment only of a sole statutory auditor or board of statutory auditors (vested with the authority to oversee compliance with the law) and not of an independent auditor; in this case, the articles of association shall assign to the statutory auditor(s) the responsibility of auditing the accounts;
  • appointment only of an independent auditor (in charge of the accounting control) and not of a statutory auditor or board of statutory auditors; in this case, the shareholders shall oversee compliance with the law.

 

It is proper to note that the rationale of the whole reform, and therefore, of the Code, lies in (i) the strengthening of the instruments to anticipate a crisis, on the one hand, (ii) the preservation of the going concern (business continuity, as required transnationally) and (iii) debt write-off together with management discontinuity, on the other hand.

 

Conclusions

This reform, which increases the awareness and “accountability” of entrepreneurs (a concept of European origin, just like the GDPR and the personal data protection reform), must certainly be welcomed. However, it is necessary to verify in the future if the new “limit of 10 employees” will foster elusive behaviours, and therefore the parcelization of companies, which in Italy already are of a small size.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…