Categories: News


28 Dec 2014

JOBS ACT: THE ACT ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT UNDER PARLIAMENTARY DELEGATION TAKES SHAPE

The night before Christmas, the Italian Government has approved the first of the decrees meant to implement the reform legislation approved by the Parliament by the beginning of December, affirmed as aimed at deeply reforming the most sensitive aspects of Italian employment law (i.e., mainly shock absorbers, dismissals and incentives to employment and re-employment). For sure the implementation decree in question, ruling a new discipline applicable to dismissals, is the most awaited Decree among the others which the Government has announced to pass quickly.



The “original” discipline of dismissals, passed in 1970 and debated for decades thereafter, had already found its first attempt to reformation in 2012, after the Monti premiership. With this decree, the present Government seem to overpass in several aspects such previous reformation. However, differently from it, it did not change the rules for those who benefit of the “old” discipline already, excluding from its applicability those who are already hired by employers staffed with more than 15 employees, this representing a undoubtable limitation to the immediate impact of the decree on a significant portion of employers/employees already engaged in an employment relationship.



The new rules will be applicable from the effective date of the Decree, which is forecasted for January 2015.



The following are the main changes regarding safeguards for employees who have been unlawfully dismissed.



a)    Increasing benefits



Without prejudice to those remaining cases in which employees’ security applies (see letter c) below), in those cases where dismissal for disciplinary or financial reasons has been declared unlawful the employee in question shall be due financial compensation only.



The amount of such compensation shall be based on the cause of unlawful dismissal, the size of the company or undertaking, and the years of service of the employee (“a tutele crescenti”, progressively increasing safeguards), and more specifically:



i.    in most cases: 2 months’ pay for each year of service, up to a maximum of 24 months’ pay and subject to a minimum of 4 months’ pay;

ii.   in cases of inadequate grounds for dismissal, or of the lack of the due disciplinary procedure: one month’s pay for each year of service up to a maximum of 12 months’ pay and subject to a minimum of 2 months’ pay;

iii.  in the case of small companies (with no more than 15 employees): the compensation is halved and may not exceed the upper limit of 6 months’ pay.



b)    Deflationary measures: rapid settlement and the annulment of dismissal



In order to encourage the rapid settlement of disputes, it has been established that within the deadline for challenging dismissal out of court (60 days), the employer, in order to avoid legal proceedings, may offer the dismissed employee one month’s pay for each year of service up to a maximum of 18 months’ pay and subject to a minimum of 2 months’ pay. 

Furthermore, in the event of annulment of dismissal within the term of fifteen days following notification of the challenge to such, the employee shall be seamlessly reinstated and shall be entitled to any pay that has accrued, without application of the penalties provided for by the decree.



c)    When reinstatement continues to apply



The decree confirms the reinstatement of the employee in cases of discriminatory or invalid dismissal, or dismissal notified verbally, and in the event of dismissal on disciplinary grounds, in the case of inexistence of the claimed act or fact given as grounds for dismissal.




Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…