Categories: Insights


11 Aug 2011

LAW BY DECREE No. 98/2011: NO BENEFIT FOR APPRENTICES AND EXECUTIVES IN CASE OF COMPANY CRISIS

Article 18, paragraph 2, Law By Decree No. 98/2011, repealed paragraph 10-bis of Article 19, Law By Decree No. 185/2008 which provided for the extension of the mobility allowance also to the employees not entitled to the ordinary treatments ex Article 7, Law No. 223/1991. Therefore, the mobility so called “in deroga” was suppressed for apprentices, executives, supplied workers, on-call workers, fixed-term employees, seasonal or occasional workers and employees dismissed by professional firms, as well as the application of the law concerning the ordinary unemployment benefit with regards to the social security contribution called “figurativa” only (eight months for employees under 50 years old and twelve months for employees aged equal or above 50 years). This abolition has been provided in spite of the previous extension of the measures under exam for the years 2010 and 2011.
However, it has been decreed that the Minister of Labour, in concert with the Minister of Economy, could grant an additional indemnity – within the limits of the Social Fund for Employment and Training and for a number of monthly payments equal to the duration of the unemployment benefit – to the employees not entitled to the mobility allowance, in case of dismissal or working relationship termination and if the such employees receive the ordinary unemployment benefit with normal requirements.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…