Categories: Insights


15 Mar 2015

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY: LIMITS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGNATION OF FUNCTIONS (IL SOLE 24 ORE, 16 MARCH 2015, PAGE 31)

The designation of functions regarding occupational safety must be shown on a written document, bearing a specific date, and have a series of requirements which are essential for being able to release an employer from significant liability in cases of damage to health. The employer, through a suitable designation of functions “has the possibility (…) to transfer to another subject the powers and obligations originally belonging to the designating party (editor’s note: the employer) regarding occupational safety issues (Penal Cassation, Fourth Section, decision 41063/2012), with the legal effect of being released “from the obligation of prevention, which he is otherwise bound by" (Penal Cassation, Fourth Section, decision 38111/2010). However, a designation document does not eliminate the protection role of the employer-designating party for safety, since part of the original position of guarantee remains with the employer for the purposes of occupational safety, with possible consequences in terms of liability.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…