Categories: Insights


17 May 2012

RECOVERY OF SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS: THE COMPLAINT WITHIN FIVE YEARS (Italia Oggi, May 17, 2012, page 39)

INPS, with message No. 8447/2012, stated that the doubling of the prescription period, from five to ten years, for the recovery of the unpaid social security contributions is applicable only if the complaint occurs within five years from the expiry thereof. Moreover, the only complaint suitable for this purpose has to be presented by the employee or by her/his heirs. In addition, the Institute confirmed that the new operational guidelines have received the changed jurisprudence guidance, based on which, as a consequence, (i) a complaint delivered after the expiration of the above mentioned period of five years from the deadline for the payment of social security contributions is not an appropriate measure of making applicable the provision concerning the extension of the prescription and (ii) under no circumstances, the social security contributions, for which, at the moment of the expiration period for the complaint, have already accrued the ordinary five-year limitation period, cannot be recovered. Lastly, INPS specified that, in order to interrupt the prescription period, it is essential that the Institute itself sends to the employer a suitable interruption deed.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…