Categories: Insights


21 Jul 2011

SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS FOR SICKNESS: FROM 1ST MAY THE EMPLOYER WHO PAYS DIRECTLY THE ABSENT EMPLOYEE IS NOT EXCLUDED ANYMORE

 INPS, with message no. 14490/2011, pointed out that the Government had removed the exemption provided for the employers which substitute the Institute in order to pay the sick employee, as in the case of Tertiary sector. In fact, Article 18, paragraph 16, point a) of the Law by Decree no. 98/2011 adds to Article 20 of Law by Decree no. 112/2008 the paragraph 1-bis, which imposes the obligation concerning the social security contribution for illness, as of May 1st, 2011, to the employers who, by law or by collective agreement, pays the sickness economic treatment instead of INPS. In the same message, INPS specifies that the same paragraph 16, point b), does not allow the claiming back of the social security contributions paid by employers up to the abovementioned date. In fact, as of that date, the employers have to pay the social security contribution for financing the illness indemnity to the employees to whom the social security insurance is applicable.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…