Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Direttiva UE n. 2018/957, distacco trasnazionale, somministrazione


30 Jul 2018

The new reform in transnational posting

The EU Directive No. 2018/957 amending the directive 96/71/EC regarding the posting of employees during the provision of services has been published on the EU Official Journal dated 9 July 2018. Specifically, the directive orders that the maximum term for transnational posting be 12 months, with the possibility of extending it for additional 6 months. At the end of the 12 months, based on the equal treatment principle, the posted employee shall be guaranteed with all the labour and employment conditions of the Country where he/she works. During the posting, the employees will be subjected to the regulations of the hosting country in terms of remuneration and they shall have the right to enjoy the lodging and indemnity conditions or reimbursement for travel expenses, meal and lodging, since he/she is away from home for business reasons. The member states shall apply also the regional or sector’s collective agreements, if widely encompassing and representative. The period in which the posted employee will hold his/her contributory regime  applicable in the origin country is reduced from 12 to 24 months and the regulations on the maximum work periods and minimum rest periods shall apply, including those governing the term of paid annual leaves. The regulation expands the application of the rules also to the staffing agencies that decide to post a worker at a user’s company headquarters or centre of activity in the territory of a member state. The Member States now have two years of time to adjust to said regulation their own domestic laws and regulations meaning by 30 July 2020.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…