Categories: Insights, Practice · News

Tag: Garante Privacy, Privacy


29 May 2026

Video-surveillance and data protection: the Italian Data Protection Authority reaffirms transparency obligations

With Decision No. 167/2026 of 12 March 2026, the Italian Data Protection Authority (“Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) once again addressed the issue of video surveillance, reaffirming certain fundamental principles relating to the processing of personal data and the remote monitoring of employees.

First of all, it should be recalled that the use of video surveillance systems constitutes, for all intents and purposes, the processing of personal data under the applicable legal framework. Consequently, the data controller is required to comply with the principles of lawfulness, fairness and transparency set out in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (“GDPR”).

In the case examined by the Authority, several critical issues were identified, including:

  • the absence of an adequate privacy notice addressed to data subjects,
  • the lack of prior authorization from the Territorial Labour Inspectorate, required because the cameras enabled the remote monitoring of employees,
  • the absence of individual credentials for accessing the recorded footage.

Particular emphasis was placed by the Authority on the breach of the transparency obligation, which was considered especially serious. Indeed, data subjects must be placed in a position to immediately understand that they are entering an area subject to video surveillance. To this end, appropriate information notices must be displayed through clearly visible signs positioned at eye level and easily readable.

The essential information to be included in the so-called “first-layer” notice includes:

  • the purposes of the processing,
  • the identity of the data controller,
  • a reference to the rights granted to data subjects under the GDPR.

The Authority also refers to the EDPB Guidelines No. 3/2019, clarifying that additional mandatory information may be provided through supplementary means (“second-layer” information), provided that such information is easily accessible. By way of example, such information may be made available:

  • at reception desks, information points or cash desks,
  • through documents displayed in accessible areas,
  • via QR codes,
  • through a dedicated web link.

The purpose is to ensure that all data subjects receive information that is complete, clear and effectively accessible.

The decision also addresses the sensitive issue of the remote monitoring of employees. As is well known, pursuant to Article 4 of the Italian Workers’ Statute, audiovisual equipment and other tools from which the monitoring of employees’ activities may derive, even indirectly, may only be installed following either a trade union agreement or prior authorization from the Territorial Labour Inspectorate.

The decision confirms the increasing attention paid by supervisory authorities to video surveillance systems, particularly in publicly accessible environments and workplaces.

Accordingly, companies should ensure that they:

  • verify the appropriate legal basis for the processing activities,
  • implement multi-layer privacy notices compliant with the GDPR,
  • install clearly visible signs containing the essential information,
  • regulate access to recorded footage through individual credentials,
  • assess whether trade union agreements or labour authority authorizations are required pursuant to Article 4 of the Italian Workers’ Statute.

Formal and substantive compliance of video surveillance systems has now become an essential safeguard not only from a data protection perspective, but also in relation to employment law and administrative sanctions.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…