Categories: Insights, Practice


8 Jan 2018

Clarifications from the Data Protection Authority on the Protection of Personal Data

The Data Protection Authority, on 15 December 2017, published on its official website a series of clarifications regarding the appointment and duties of the Data Protection Officer (“DPO”). More specifically, the Data Protection Officer must have specific skills, preferably, whenever appointed internally, be a Manager or a high ranking professional to be appointed with a specific deed. The Data Protection Authority, in addition, clarifies that this task cannot be carried out neither by the corporate IT System’s Manager nor any other professional figure with conflict of interest. In addition, the Data Protection Authority points out that even though there are no diplomas or degrees suitable to train the Data Protection Officer, even if he/she must have specific legal knowledge, now there are a variety of courses that offer specific training on the matter and the Data Protection Authority recommends attending them. In fact, it is reminded that the appointment of a non-competent person or a person not suitable to carry out the role of Data Protection Officer could lead to fines for the Data Controller, among which the payment of administrative fines. Finally, it is specified that the role could be held also by a legal entity, as long as there is an individual within the company that acts as a reference.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…