Categories: Insights, Practice


26 Feb 2017

Massive, prolonged and indiscriminate monitoring on computer tools provided to employees are forbidden

With measure no. 547 dated 22 December 2016 and published in the newsletter of 17 February 2017, the Privacy Authority for the protection of personal data reaffirmed that an employer cannot access indiscriminately emails or personal data contained in the devices provided to employees. According to the Privacy Authority, the employer, in spite of having the right to check the proper performance of the service and the correct use of the work tools by the employee, must in any case safeguard personal freedom and dignity, complying with legal regulations. The labour regulations on remote monitoring (in this case under article 4 of the Worker’s Statute in its “new formulation” after the Jobs Act), moreover establishes that it is unlawful to carry out activities suitable to achieve, even indirectly, a massive, prolonged and indiscriminate monitoring of the employee’s performance. And in any case, the Privacy Authority reaffirms that employees must always be informed clearly and in a detailed manner about the methods of use of the tools in question and about any monitoring activities. This is because the absence of an explicit policy in this regard may lead to a legitimate expectation by the employee (or a third party) of the confidentiality of certain forms of communication.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…