Categories: Insights, Practice


29 May 2018

The clarifications of the Italian National Labor Inspectorate (“INL”) relating to the filing of the conciliation minutes signed before the trade unions

The Confederdia Union has requested clarifications to the National Labour Inspectorate (“INL”) regarding the rejection issued by the territorial office of the Inspectorate to the filing of the minutes of conciliation signed pursuant to art. 411 of the Civil Code, justified with the alleged lack of powers by the union. In this respect, INL, with note dated 17 May 2018 number 163, has above all highlighted that the fundamental requirement of conciliation talks with a trade union is the fact that the agreement has to be reached with the effective support of the employee by his/her trade union. Furthermore, the note has recalled – after having referred back to the rules governing conciliation talks with trade unions as well as the requirements of actual mandate and representation powers called for by the case law of the supreme courts – what had already been established by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies (protocol 5199 dated 16/03/2016 and protocol 5755 dated 22/03/2016). In particular, INL stated once again that, in order to file the minutes at the territorial office and in light of what is established in art. 412 ter of the Civil Code, the union must be in possession of specific representation powers”. According to INL, given that not all the collective agreements establish specific conciliation procedures, the solution of a self-declaration of the union regarding possession of the requirement of greater representation (to be adopted only in those cases in which trade union conciliation is performed according to specific contractual provisions) allows the inspectors to avoid technically complex audits and at the same time ensures union self-regulation in application of the regulations establishing it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…