Categories: Insights, Practice


29 May 2018

The clarifications of the Italian National Labor Inspectorate (“INL”) relating to the filing of the conciliation minutes signed before the trade unions

The Confederdia Union has requested clarifications to the National Labour Inspectorate (“INL”) regarding the rejection issued by the territorial office of the Inspectorate to the filing of the minutes of conciliation signed pursuant to art. 411 of the Civil Code, justified with the alleged lack of powers by the union. In this respect, INL, with note dated 17 May 2018 number 163, has above all highlighted that the fundamental requirement of conciliation talks with a trade union is the fact that the agreement has to be reached with the effective support of the employee by his/her trade union. Furthermore, the note has recalled – after having referred back to the rules governing conciliation talks with trade unions as well as the requirements of actual mandate and representation powers called for by the case law of the supreme courts – what had already been established by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies (protocol 5199 dated 16/03/2016 and protocol 5755 dated 22/03/2016). In particular, INL stated once again that, in order to file the minutes at the territorial office and in light of what is established in art. 412 ter of the Civil Code, the union “must be in possession of specific representation powers”. According to INL, given that not all the collective agreements establish specific conciliation procedures, the solution of a self-declaration of the union regarding possession of the requirement of greater representation (to be adopted only in those cases in which trade union conciliation is performed according to specific contractual provisions) allows the inspectors to avoid technically complex audits and at the same time ensures union self-regulation in application of the regulations establishing it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…