Categories: Insights, Practice


29 May 2018

The clarifications of the Italian National Labor Inspectorate (“INL”) relating to the filing of the conciliation minutes signed before the trade unions

The Confederdia Union has requested clarifications to the National Labour Inspectorate (“INL”) regarding the rejection issued by the territorial office of the Inspectorate to the filing of the minutes of conciliation signed pursuant to art. 411 of the Civil Code, justified with the alleged lack of powers by the union. In this respect, INL, with note dated 17 May 2018 number 163, has above all highlighted that the fundamental requirement of conciliation talks with a trade union is the fact that the agreement has to be reached with the effective support of the employee by his/her trade union. Furthermore, the note has recalled – after having referred back to the rules governing conciliation talks with trade unions as well as the requirements of actual mandate and representation powers called for by the case law of the supreme courts – what had already been established by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies (protocol 5199 dated 16/03/2016 and protocol 5755 dated 22/03/2016). In particular, INL stated once again that, in order to file the minutes at the territorial office and in light of what is established in art. 412 ter of the Civil Code, the union must be in possession of specific representation powers”. According to INL, given that not all the collective agreements establish specific conciliation procedures, the solution of a self-declaration of the union regarding possession of the requirement of greater representation (to be adopted only in those cases in which trade union conciliation is performed according to specific contractual provisions) allows the inspectors to avoid technically complex audits and at the same time ensures union self-regulation in application of the regulations establishing it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…