Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: appalti, Dismissal, INL


31 Jul 2024

DID YOU KNOW THAT… there are criminal penalties for unlawful contracting, secondment and staff supply work? 

Italian Decree-Law no. 19/2024 (converted by Italian Law no. 56/2024) increased penalties for unlawfully carrying out staff supply work, contracting and secondment by expanding the cases for which there are criminal penalties.

In summary, contracting, secondment, and staff supply work are considered unlawful when workers are used without meeting legal requirements, for evasive purposes, and without the contractor, seconding party, or staff supplier exercising managerial and organisational powers.

On this point, the Italian National Labour Inspectorate (Ispettorato Nazionale del Lavoro, ‘INL’) first intervened in note no. 1091/2024 to clarify the exact amount of the applicable fines and the complex recidivism mechanism. Subsequently, in note no. 1133/2024, the INL examined the transitional regime for the application of the new penalties.

On the latter point, the INL has clarified that the new criminal penalties apply in relation to conduct that took place on or after 2 March 2024, the effective date of Italian Decree-Law no. 19/2024. For conduct that started and finished before 2 March 2024, on the other hand, the previous penalty regime of an administrative nature, regulated by Circular no. 6/2016 by the Ministry of Labour, applies.

However, the real issue, which has now been clarified, relates to conduct straddling the enactment of Italian Decree-Law no. 19/2024. The INL has confirmed that conduct started before 2 March 2024 and continued after that date is exclusively criminal in nature and therefore is subject to the penalties established by the new penalty regime.

In addition, the INL has also clarified that in determining the applicable penalty, which is linked to the number of days of unlawful employment of personnel, due to the possible alternatives of imprisonment and fines, periods prior to 2 March 2024 should also be considered. This is because the days of employment are relevant in assessing the seriousness of the offence, which, in turn, determines a proportional and “mandatory” sanction which is predetermined by reason of the workers involved and the number of days and constitutes a mere instrument to quantify fines with reference to conduct that must necessarily be considered as a single offence.


Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…