Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Dismissal, Licenziamento, Referedum


11 Jun 2025

No quorum. Legislative action on the regulation of layoffs (Radiocor of Il Sole 24 Ore, 11 June 2025 – Vittorio De Luca)

Legislative Decree No. 23/2015 survived the recent referendum on June 8 and 9, which, with a turnout of 30.6 percent, did not reach a quorum. The result is not surprising, but the repeal of Legislative Decree No. 23/2015 would, in any case, have been of little consequence from the point of view of the protections offered to workers.

Recall that the system of ‘increasing protections’ was born, as part of the 2014 labor market reform, to create an organic discipline of the sanctioning apparatus of illegitimate dismissals announced, both by employers with more than 15 employees and by those ‘sub-threshold’, to workers hired since March 7, 2015. In the intentions of the legislature, the reform was supposed to come into force gradually being, precisely, intended to apply only to new employment relationships initiated from that date.

Compared to Article 18 of the Workers’ Statute, which had already been deeply amended by the ‘Fornero Reform’ in 2012, Legislative Decree No. 23/2015 aimed to introduce a new system of protections based on two principles. The first, the introduction of a compensation indemnity increasing according to the length of service of the employee concerned and, the second, the limitation of the scope of application of reinstatement protection. In fact, the reform in question had provided, in line with the disciplines adopted in Germany and Spain, a rigid mathematical formula parameterized by seniority, to eliminate the discretion of judges in determining compensatory indemnities.

Continue reading the full version published on Radiocor of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…