Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: CCNL, Datore di lavoro


28 Feb 2020

The unilateral withdrawal of the employer from the currently applicable National Collective Bargaining Agreement (NCBA) is unlawful (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 139 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Court of Cassation, in its judgment no. 21537/2019, declared the unilateral termination of the applied NCBA by the employer before its natural expiry date unlawful, even if accompanied by adequate notice. This power lies solely with the signatories of the NCBA, i.e. the trade unions and employers’ associations. According to the Court of Cassation, the individual employer is not allowed to unilaterally withdraw from the collective agreement, not even on the grounds that it is excessively onerous, resulting from its own difficult economic situation. Therefore, the employer is bound by the NCBA even if it dissociates from the trade union organisation to which it belongs. However, the employer has the right to withdraw from the NCBA signed for an indefinite period, without predetermining the expiry date. This is because the contract cannot bind all the contracting parties forever, otherwise the development of industrial relations would not be allowed, thus frustrating the cause and the social function of collective bargaining. It is understood that the withdrawal must be exercised respecting the principles of fairness and good faith and without affecting workers’ intangible rights. And in this case, in the opinion of the Court of Cassation, there is no obligation on the employer to negotiate and enter into the NCBA with all the trade unions. The possibility of signing a new contract with trade unions, even if different from those that have negotiated and signed the previous one, falls within the employer’s negotiating autonomy. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…