Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: CCNL, Datore di lavoro


28 Feb 2020

The unilateral withdrawal of the employer from the currently applicable National Collective Bargaining Agreement (NCBA) is unlawful (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 139 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Court of Cassation, in its judgment no. 21537/2019, declared the unilateral termination of the applied NCBA by the employer before its natural expiry date unlawful, even if accompanied by adequate notice. This power lies solely with the signatories of the NCBA, i.e. the trade unions and employers’ associations. According to the Court of Cassation, the individual employer is not allowed to unilaterally withdraw from the collective agreement, not even on the grounds that it is excessively onerous, resulting from its own difficult economic situation. Therefore, the employer is bound by the NCBA even if it dissociates from the trade union organisation to which it belongs. However, the employer has the right to withdraw from the NCBA signed for an indefinite period, without predetermining the expiry date. This is because the contract cannot bind all the contracting parties forever, otherwise the development of industrial relations would not be allowed, thus frustrating the cause and the social function of collective bargaining. It is understood that the withdrawal must be exercised respecting the principles of fairness and good faith and without affecting workers’ intangible rights. And in this case, in the opinion of the Court of Cassation, there is no obligation on the employer to negotiate and enter into the NCBA with all the trade unions. The possibility of signing a new contract with trade unions, even if different from those that have negotiated and signed the previous one, falls within the employer’s negotiating autonomy. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…