Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: CCNL, Datore di lavoro


28 Feb 2020

The unilateral withdrawal of the employer from the currently applicable National Collective Bargaining Agreement (NCBA) is unlawful (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 139 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Court of Cassation, in its judgment no. 21537/2019, declared the unilateral termination of the applied NCBA by the employer before its natural expiry date unlawful, even if accompanied by adequate notice. This power lies solely with the signatories of the NCBA, i.e. the trade unions and employers’ associations. According to the Court of Cassation, the individual employer is not allowed to unilaterally withdraw from the collective agreement, not even on the grounds that it is excessively onerous, resulting from its own difficult economic situation. Therefore, the employer is bound by the NCBA even if it dissociates from the trade union organisation to which it belongs. However, the employer has the right to withdraw from the NCBA signed for an indefinite period, without predetermining the expiry date. This is because the contract cannot bind all the contracting parties forever, otherwise the development of industrial relations would not be allowed, thus frustrating the cause and the social function of collective bargaining. It is understood that the withdrawal must be exercised respecting the principles of fairness and good faith and without affecting workers’ intangible rights. And in this case, in the opinion of the Court of Cassation, there is no obligation on the employer to negotiate and enter into the NCBA with all the trade unions. The possibility of signing a new contract with trade unions, even if different from those that have negotiated and signed the previous one, falls within the employer’s negotiating autonomy. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…