Access to NASpI in light of recent case law (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)
The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), established by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the main income support measure for employees who have involuntarily lost their jobs. Its purpose is to provide financial support during the transition to new employment. Although the relevant regulatory framework is well established, its practical application continues to evolve and be refined, mainly through case law and INPS administrative practice.
Article 3 of Legislative Decree No. 22/2015 sets out the requirements that workers must meet in order to qualify for NASpI benefits. These are:
1. Involuntary unemployment: the fundamental requirement is that the loss of employment must not result from the worker’s voluntary decision.
Therefore, NASpI benefits are payable in the following cases:
dismissal for subjective or objective justified reasons, or for just cause;
resignation for just cause (or following acts of persecution or gender-based violence, see INPS Message No. 2549 of 3 August 2026), or resignation by new parents during the protected period (INPS Circular No. 32 of 20 March 2023);
consensual termination of the employment relationship: in a protected setting as part of the procedure under Article 7 of Law No. 604/1966; or following the employee’s refusal to be transferred to another workplace of the same company located more than 50 km from the employee’s residence and/or requiring an average journey of 80 minutes or more by public transport (INPS Circular No. 142 of 29 July 2015);
In recent years, artificial intelligence has evolved from an experimental technology into a tool that is increasingly integrated into the day-to-day activities of HR functions. Among other things,…
At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…
The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…
Headnote In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…
The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…
The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…