Categories: Insights, Publications


27 Feb 2018

Racism and xenophobia: new paradigms on administrative liability for entities (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 121 – Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Luciano Vella)

On November 8 2017, the Chamber of Deputies cast its final vote approving European Law 2017, comprising 30 articles among which there is the introduction, as part of Law Decree 231/01, of article 25-duodecies. In particular, the regulation introduces among the offences detailed in the Law Decree 231 those of Racism and Xenophobia, as per Law 654/75. In fact, the offences under review punish those conducts aimed at spreading propaganda, instigation and incitement founded on “denying, grossly trivializing or condoning the holocaust or crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes”. Breach of this regulation may lead to fines up to a maximum of EUR 1,239,200 as well as to disqualification as per art. 9 of the Law Decree No. 231. In light of the above, the organisational models shall include significant guarantees also safeguarding relationships within the company, so as to prevent that in the internal dynamics among employees, discriminatory situations may occur and/or emerge that could give rise to the offences in hand. In this context, the employer shall, therefore, update the organisational model ensuring the adoption of protocols and/or measures that are specific and adequate to prevent these offences from happening within the work environment.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…