Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: Riders


22 Sep 2020

Signed the National Collective Bargaining Agreement but the Riders remain “self-employed”(Il Quotidiano del Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 September 2020 – Alberto De Luca, Raffaele Di Vuolo)

On September 15, 2020, the trade union associations ASSODELIVERY and UGL-RIDER signed the first National Collective Bargaining Agreement (“NCBA”) governing the relationship between Bike Delivery Riders so called “Riders” and their companies. The agreement, called “National Collective Bargaining Agreement for governing the delivery of goods on behalf of third parties, carried out by self-employed workers, the so-called Riders”, has been reached after almost a year following the entering into force of Law No. 128/2019 introducing the first measures for the protection of “gig economy” workers. Article no. 8 of the NCBA defines Riders as “self-employed workers who, based on a contract with one or more platforms, decides whether to render its own delivery services for the goods ordered through the relevant application”. That being stated the NCBA provides different provisions such as a minimum guaranteed fee for the riders, bonus systems, safety equipment, insurance coverage, prohibition to discriminate and equal opportunities, personal data protection and trade union rights excluding, at the same time, the typical institutions of employment from arising such as, for instance, remuneration for overtime, additional monthly payments, annual leave, severance pay. Furthermore the NCBA rules also the termination of the self-employment.

In particular Riders are entitled to unilaterally withdraw from the contract at any time with immediate effect, whilst the principal is requested to give at least 30 days’ notice unless the payment of an indemnity is chosen by the principle. However during these days the main trade unions associations and the Ministry of Labour are discussing about the lawfulness of the NCBA based on the representation of the UGL-RIDER.

Source: Il Quotidiano del Lavoro

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…