Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Garante, Lavoro Agile, Sicurezza


29 May 2017

Remote work: health and safety in the workplace

With the main goal of balancing private life and work, DDL 2233-B has been approved in its final version, which, in fact, governs the so-called remote work, that is the type of work performed outside of the employer’s premises and without specific requirements in terms of working hours. The intrinsic characteristics of remote work clearly imply a lower level of monitoring by the employer; this also applies to those elements that may have an impact on the health and safety of the worker. As a result, and without prejudice to the fact that the employer remains responsible for the health and safety of the worker, the law-maker established that the employer shall provide the worker and to the Workers’ representative, at least once a year, with a written information notice detailing the general and specific risks connected to performing a specific type of work while employed by the employer. On the other hand, the employer is made aware and becomes liable since he/she is expressly obligated to cooperate in implementing the preventive measures established by the employer to face the risks connected to the performance of the duties outside the workplace. However, the aforementioned requirements do not void the liability of the employer to guarantee the worker’s health and safety. In fact, unless exceptions are applied, please note that the employer must also follow the regulations established in the Consolidated Law on Safety (Legislative Decree 81/2008) applicable to the specific matters that characterise remote work.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…