Categories: Insights, Do you know that

Tag: D.lgs. 231/2001


5 Jan 2022

DID YOU KNOW THAT… The catalogue of predicate offences for the administrative liability of entities has been extended?

On 8 November, the national legislature approved two separate legislative decrees introducing new predicate offences to the list of administrative liability of entities under Legislative Decree no. 231/2001. These are:

  • Legislative Decree no. 184, which transposed European Directive no. 2019/713 “on combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment” and
  • Legislative Decree no. 195, which transposed European Directive no. 2018/1673 “on combating money laundering by means of criminal law”,

published in the Official Gazette, respectively, last 29 and 30 November 2021 and entered into force, respectively, on 14 and 15 December.

Going into detail, Legislative Decree no. 184/2021 introduced into the Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 in art. 25 octies.1 “Offences relating to non-cash means of payment.”  This sanctions the entity in whose interest the following offences are committed:

  • improper use and falsification of non-cash payments;
  • possession and dissemination of IT equipment, devices or programs aimed at committing offences concerning non-cash payment means;
  • computer fraud in cases aggravated by the transfer of money, monetary value or virtual currency.

Legislative Decree no. 195/2021, extends art. 25-octies Legislative Decree no. 231/2001, by including the offences of receiving, laundering, self-laundering and using money, goods or benefits of unlawful origin, violators face imprisonment from six months to a maximum of a year. This applies to culpable offences for money laundering and self-laundering.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…