Categories: Insights · News, Interviews

Tag: contratti a termine, Dismissal


26 Feb 2024

The “Milleproroghe Decree” – the expert’s view: “How the new rules on fixed-term contracts work in practice” (ADNKronos – 22 February 2024, Vittorio De Luca)

“With the imminent conversion into law of the Italian Milleproroghe Decree, the extension of the deadline for entering into a fixed-term contract beyond 12 months, by agreement between the parties, is on its way. The extension granted by the decree will be from 30 April to 31 December 2024 and it will temporarily extend the period in which companies can extend fixed-term contracts up to a total of 24 months, if there are explicit technical, organisational or production needs”, Vittorio De Luca, lawyer and managing partner at De Luca & Partners, explains to Adnkronos/Labitalia.

“The purpose of the provision – explains Mr De Luca who is an expert in this field – is to give the stakeholders more time to adapt the collective bargaining agreements very few of which, for the time being, have introduced provisions on the reasons justifying fixed-term contracts, leaving many production sectors uncovered. In fact, as is well known, the latest amendment to the regulations governing fixed-term contracts was introduced by the Italian Employment Decree (Decree-Law no. 28/2023), which, by reformulating Article 19 of Italian Legislative Decree no. 81/2015, established an innovative regime in the event of continuation of the fixed-term contract beyond the term of 12 months”, he explains.

“The current version of the provision states that, after the first 12 months – for which no reason is required – the fixed-term relationship can continue (up to 24 months) only for the replacement of workers and in the cases provided for by collective bargaining. In the absence of provisions in collective bargaining agreements, on a temporary basis until 30 April 2024 (now extended to 31 December) technical, organisational or production reasons identified by the parties will also be sufficient”, concludes Mr. De Luca.

Press release:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…