Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Decreto trasparenza


1 Aug 2022

Transparency Decree changes “exclusivity clause” (Il Sole 24 Ore and Il Quotidiano del Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore, 1 August 2022 – Vittorio De Luca, Claudia Cerbone)

Chapter III of Legislative Decree 104/2022, implementing the European Transparency Directive 2019/1152, published in the “Official Gazette” 176 of 29 July and in force since 13 August, identified the minimum working conditions requirements. The first provision related to the probationary period maximum duration (Article 7), emphasises certain case law existing principles. The probationary period may not exceed six months unless the collective agreement applied to the relationship requires a shorter duration. The probationary period in fixed-term contracts must be proportionate to the contract duration, and the tasks assigned based on the employment type. If there is a contract renewal for the same tasks, a new probationary period may not be imposed.

If there are suspensions (such as illness, accident and compulsory leave), the probationary period duration is extended to a time equal to the employee’s absence.

One of the decree changes refers to the combination of jobs (Article 8), i.e., the better known “exclusivity clause” which entitled the employer to prohibit the employee from carrying out a different profession. For the first time, the decree forbids the employer (and the principal) from preventing the employee from carrying out another job outside the agreed working hours or treat them unfavourably for that reason. Exceptions can be applied if the second job is detrimental to the worker’s health and safety (including compliance with rest regulations) or does not guarantee the integrity of the public service or is in conflict of interest with the main job (but not in breach of the loyalty duty).

Another change concerns the minimum predictability of work (Article 9). The employer may not require the employee to perform work if working hours are not predetermined. The employee has the right to refuse to work, without suffering any prejudice, including disciplinary action.

Continue reading the full version published on Il Quotidiano del Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…