Categories: Insights · News, Interviews


10 Nov 2015

Dismissal and unemployment during the 9 months: what you need to know (QuiMamme.it – Io e il mio bambino, 11 November 2015)

What social shock absorbers does the Jobs Act include in the event of dismissal? And how do they reconcile with protections for maternity? We spoke with Elena Cannone, a lawyer from the De Luca & Partners law firm in Milan, specialised in employment law.
Unemployment benefits (Italian mobilità) during pregnancy.
This social shock absorber regards companies with more than 15 employees, an indemnity – a percentage of the salary – to which the worker has the right following a lay-off. It has the dual aim of sustaining income and promoting job reinstatement or professional retraining. During the period of unemployment benefits, the worker may be called for a training course or for an interview at another company which may hire them: in this case, if they refuse the job, they lose the right to the indemnity.
How is this system applied in the case of a pregnant woman? “The rules,” said Ms. Cannone, “are prior to the Jobs Act. The latter does not affect the principle to protect maternity, or the unemployment benefit mechanism”. Let’s look at some specific cases.
If the company uses unemployment benefits when the woman is already pregnant.
From the beginning of the pregnancy until the child is one year old the worker cannot be dismissed or suspended from work (as per article 54, paragraph 4 of Italian Legislative Decree 151/2001 – Consolidated Act on the protection and support of maternity and paternity), unless the company closes or activity is suspended in the department where the woman is employed, if it has complete operating autonomy. “In this case the company must demonstrate that the woman cannot be transferred”, said Elena Cannone.

Source:

QuiMamme.it (Io e il mio bambino)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…