19 Nov 2021

Legitimate worker transfer even if their unusability in the original location was unproved (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 19 November 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Debhora Scarano)

With its order no. 32506 of 8 November 2021, the Court of Cassation addressed the issue of judicial review of the technical, organisational and production reasons underlying transfers under art. 2103 of the Italian Civil Code. The case in question arose from an employee’s legal application for a declaration of the unlawfulness of the transfer ordered against him, with a consequent request for reinstatement at his original place of work and damages. The appellant believed that the reasons given for the transfer, i.e. the reduction in turnover at the original site where he was employed and the need to reduce the workforce, had been insufficiently investigated by the Court. An increase in company profits compared to the previous year and a new resource being recruited to the area the appellant had been assigned contradicted these reasons. The Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal rejected the appellant’s requests, upholding the transfer’s legitimacy. The Court of First Instance found that the reasons supporting the transfer decision were consistent with the employer’s communication. It verified the Company’s turnover decrease, and considered the attached profit and loss account proving the increase in company profits to be insignificant, given Company’s overall figure. The worker appealed to the Court of Cassation, claiming that the Court of Appeal had erred in Law, in that it had assessed as evidence mere allegations provided by the employer, without the latter having fulfilled a burden of proof.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…