19 Nov 2021

Legitimate worker transfer even if their unusability in the original location was unproved (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 19 November 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Debhora Scarano)

With its order no. 32506 of 8 November 2021, the Court of Cassation addressed the issue of judicial review of the technical, organisational and production reasons underlying transfers under art. 2103 of the Italian Civil Code. The case in question arose from an employee’s legal application for a declaration of the unlawfulness of the transfer ordered against him, with a consequent request for reinstatement at his original place of work and damages. The appellant believed that the reasons given for the transfer, i.e. the reduction in turnover at the original site where he was employed and the need to reduce the workforce, had been insufficiently investigated by the Court. An increase in company profits compared to the previous year and a new resource being recruited to the area the appellant had been assigned contradicted these reasons. The Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal rejected the appellant’s requests, upholding the transfer’s legitimacy. The Court of First Instance found that the reasons supporting the transfer decision were consistent with the employer’s communication. It verified the Company’s turnover decrease, and considered the attached profit and loss account proving the increase in company profits to be insignificant, given Company’s overall figure. The worker appealed to the Court of Cassation, claiming that the Court of Appeal had erred in Law, in that it had assessed as evidence mere allegations provided by the employer, without the latter having fulfilled a burden of proof.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…