Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Licenziamento, malattia, morbilità


29 May 2017

Maximum number of sickness absence days: the months are calculated as being of 30 days

The Court of appeal of Milan, with judgement No. 890 dated 6 April 2017, ruled once again on the maximum number of sickness absence days whenever it is expressed in months and the CCNL (Collective bargaining agreement) of the sector in question does not specifically govern the calculation procedure. In the specific case, a worker appealed the dismissal ordered to her on the assumption that pursuant to the Confapi CCNL the 18 months of sickness absence days had to be calculated on the basis of calendar days. The Judges, by referring to previous case law, clarified instead that the calculation system must be only one and be consistent and uniform. To this end, the factor must always be 30, also if the absences occurred during months shorter or longer than 30 days”. Therefore, in the case in hand, the 18 months of the sickness absence days established by the CCNL of the sector must always and in any case be equal to 540 days.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

27 Apr 2026

Gestione della posta elettronica aziendale dopo la cessazione del rapporto di lavoro: il Garante estende il diritto di accesso a tutte le mail della casella e-mail nominativa 

“Il lavoratore può accedere ai messaggi del proprio account e-mail aziendale e ai documenti presenti nel pc dopo la fine del rapporto di lavoro. Eventuali limitazioni devono essere…

27 Apr 2026

NASpI e dimissioni per trasferimento oltre 50km: per la Cassazione non basta la distanza, va provato l’inadempimento del datore di lavoro 

Con la recente ordinanza n. 10559 del 21 aprile 2026, la Corte di Cassazione si è pronunciata in tema di indennità di disoccupazione (NASpI) a seguito di dimissioni per giusta causa dovute a trasferimento del…

27 Apr 2026

Lo sai che… il patto di prova è nullo se le mansioni sono indicate in modo generico? 

Il Tribunale di Milano, Sezione Lavoro, con sentenza n. 683 del 3 aprile 2026, ha ribadito che il patto di prova è valido solo se contiene una specifica…

17 Apr 2026

Criminal penalties are being introduced for those who fail to protect remote workers (The Platform, 17 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Martina De Angeli)

The provision amends Legislative Decree 81/2008 by introducing a new Article 3, paragraph 7-bis, which makes compliance with safety obligations conditional upon the delivery—at least annually—of a written…

15 Apr 2026

Dismissal deemed valid based on a message sent in a WhatsApp chat (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7982 of March 31, 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section) held that a message sent within a private chat may constitute just cause for…

13 Apr 2026

De Luca & Partners, the boutique turns 50 years old (MAG – Legalcommunity, 13 April 2026 – Vincenzo De Luca, Vittorio De Luca e Roberta Padula)

It was 1976 when labor lawyer Vincenzo De Luca decided to open his firm in Milan. He came from Barletta and rented a small office in Largo Corsia…