Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Licenziamento, malattia, morbilità


29 May 2017

Maximum number of sickness absence days: the months are calculated as being of 30 days

The Court of appeal of Milan, with judgement No. 890 dated 6 April 2017, ruled once again on the maximum number of sickness absence days whenever it is expressed in months and the CCNL (Collective bargaining agreement) of the sector in question does not specifically govern the calculation procedure. In the specific case, a worker appealed the dismissal ordered to her on the assumption that pursuant to the Confapi CCNL the 18 months of sickness absence days had to be calculated on the basis of calendar days. The Judges, by referring to previous case law, clarified instead that “the calculation system must be only one and be consistent and uniform. To this end, the factor must always be 30, also if the absences occurred during months shorter or longer than 30 days”. Therefore, in the case in hand, the 18 months of the sickness absence days established by the CCNL of the sector must always and in any case be equal to 540 days.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

22 Oct 2026

Access to NASpI in light of recent case law (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), established by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the main income support measure for employees who have involuntarily…

19 Oct 2026

From Innovation to Governance: The Impact of the AI Act on HR Processes, between Compliance, Transparency and Accountability (AIDP – HR Online, 19 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Martina De Angela)

In recent years, artificial intelligence has evolved from an experimental technology into a tool that is increasingly integrated into the day-to-day activities of HR functions. Among other things,…

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…