Categories: News, Events


10 Jan 2019

HR Breakfast: “Dismissal: the latest safeguards, in light of recent legislative measures and a judgement of the Constitutional Court” – 29 January 2019

Law no. 98 of 9 August, converting Law Decree no. 87/2018 (the so-called Dignity Decree) with amendments, was published on Official Gazette no. 186/2018.

 

While not altering the method of determination – linked to seniority – referred to in art. 3 of Legislative Decree no. 23 dated 4 March 2015, the Dignity Decree establishes that compensation in cases of wrongful dismissal should be equivalent to at least 6 months’ salaries (compared to 4 under the former legislation) and at most 36 months’ salaries (compared to 24), based on the final salary used to calculate severance pay.

 

The method for determining compensation, instead, required the involvement of the Constitutional Court.

 

On 14 November last, Official Gazette no. 45 published the operative part of judgement no. 194/2018 with which the Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of art. 3, para. 1, of Legislative Decree No. 23/2015 exclusively as regards the wording “equivalent to two months’ salaries, based on the final salary used to calculate severance pay for every year of service”.

 

According to the Constitutional Court, the method for quantifying compensation under Legislative Decree No. 23/2015, also in the version amended by the Dignity Decree, results in a “rigid compensation system that applies uniformly to all workers and cannot be scaled based on parameters other than seniority of service. In this way, compensation becomes a standard, flat-rate liquidation…of the damage to workers arising from wrongful dismissal from permanent employment”.

 

This contrasts with the principles of equality and reasonableness, and therefore the determination of damage in the event of wrongful dismissal should be a matter for the Courts.

 

As a result of the ascertained unconstitutionality of the Legislative Decree, today, the courts also have ample discretion over the dismissal of resources hired after 7 March 2015, which discretion – according to the Constitutional Court – shall have to be exercised “within the minimum and maximum limits of compensation (the new limits dictated by the Dignity Decree – ed.)”, “taking into account a number of criteria in addition to seniority of service”.

 

The courts, therefore, may exercise discretion in determining the amount of compensation due to workers in the event of wrongful dismissal, with the difference that workers hired after the entry into force of the Jobs Act may – in certain cases – be awarded greater compensation than those hired before 7 March 2015, thereby falling under the provisions of art. 18 of Law 300/1970.

 

With Lawyers Enrico De Luca and Stefania Raviele, we intend to review the situation on workers’ safeguards and on the risks of a lawsuit due to wrongful dismissal.

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…

17 Apr 2026

Criminal penalties are being introduced for those who fail to protect remote workers (The Platform, 17 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Martina De Angeli)

The provision amends Legislative Decree 81/2008 by introducing a new Article 3, paragraph 7-bis, which makes compliance with safety obligations conditional upon the delivery—at least annually—of a written…

15 Apr 2026

Dismissal deemed valid based on a message sent in a WhatsApp chat (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7982 of March 31, 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section) held that a message sent within a private chat may constitute just cause for…