Categories: News, Events


10 Jan 2019

HR Breakfast: “Dismissal: the latest safeguards, in light of recent legislative measures and a judgement of the Constitutional Court” – 29 January 2019

Law no. 98 of 9 August, converting Law Decree no. 87/2018 (the so-called Dignity Decree) with amendments, was published on Official Gazette no. 186/2018.

 

While not altering the method of determination – linked to seniority – referred to in art. 3 of Legislative Decree no. 23 dated 4 March 2015, the Dignity Decree establishes that compensation in cases of wrongful dismissal should be equivalent to at least 6 months’ salaries (compared to 4 under the former legislation) and at most 36 months’ salaries (compared to 24), based on the final salary used to calculate severance pay.

 

The method for determining compensation, instead, required the involvement of the Constitutional Court.

 

On 14 November last, Official Gazette no. 45 published the operative part of judgement no. 194/2018 with which the Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of art. 3, para. 1, of Legislative Decree No. 23/2015 exclusively as regards the wording “equivalent to two months’ salaries, based on the final salary used to calculate severance pay for every year of service”.

 

According to the Constitutional Court, the method for quantifying compensation under Legislative Decree No. 23/2015, also in the version amended by the Dignity Decree, results in a “rigid compensation system that applies uniformly to all workers and cannot be scaled based on parameters other than seniority of service. In this way, compensation becomes a standard, flat-rate liquidation…of the damage to workers arising from wrongful dismissal from permanent employment”.

 

This contrasts with the principles of equality and reasonableness, and therefore the determination of damage in the event of wrongful dismissal should be a matter for the Courts.

 

As a result of the ascertained unconstitutionality of the Legislative Decree, today, the courts also have ample discretion over the dismissal of resources hired after 7 March 2015, which discretion – according to the Constitutional Court – shall have to be exercised “within the minimum and maximum limits of compensation (the new limits dictated by the Dignity Decree – ed.)”, “taking into account a number of criteria in addition to seniority of service”.

 

The courts, therefore, may exercise discretion in determining the amount of compensation due to workers in the event of wrongful dismissal, with the difference that workers hired after the entry into force of the Jobs Act may – in certain cases – be awarded greater compensation than those hired before 7 March 2015, thereby falling under the provisions of art. 18 of Law 300/1970.

 

With Lawyers Enrico De Luca and Stefania Raviele, we intend to review the situation on workers’ safeguards and on the risks of a lawsuit due to wrongful dismissal.

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…