Categories: Insights · News, Interviews


4 Jun 2017

“No more alibis for not hiring” (L’Economia – Il Corriere della Sera, 5 June 2017 – Vittorio De Luca)

With the elimination of vouchers and the obligation to dispose of those already purchased, companies are finding themselves at a crossroads this summer. What contract type is best to adopt to legally hire seasonal workers? “This summer the companies are already looking at solutions that entail doing without vouchers”, stated Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner of De Luca & Partners. “An employer who needs to hire a worker for a few hours will end up stipulating a freelance type contract which does not include any insurance or pension coverage, and which often results in litigation, or will use temporary work contracts”. A real step backwards for our country, according to the lawyer. “We have lost an opportunity with vouchers. We needed to do more work to reduce the room for misusing them”. Starting from under the table work. “Businesses may be tempted to use less protective contractual instruments for workers. Moreover, temporary work contracts are full of complexities. For example, it is necessary to insure the contract with the temporary agency, as well as deal with a lot of red tape. “Having abolished the voucher instruments on one hand eliminated a possibility for employers but on the other it also got rid of an opportunity for young people and students who could take on occasional jobs added De Luca -. The vouchers were useful for short-term, low paid work, given that the remuneration for workers with no professional qualification is 7 euro per hour”, he continued. In addition, at the same time as a reduction in the possibility of using vouchers, the category of independent contractors was regulated with Jobs Act due. “Since the approval of the contract with increased protection based on seniority there are no more alibis in the country for not hiring with open-end contracts”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…