22 Jun 2021

Lawful suspension from work and pay of non-vaccinated healthcare operators (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 juin 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With its order dated 19 May 2021, issued at the end of an interlocutory judgment, the Court of Modena held that suspension from work and pay of two non-vaccinated healthcare operators was lawful.  The case arose from the refusal of two physiotherapists working in a nursing home to vaccinate against Covid-19, with the employer’s ensuing decision to suspend their employment and pay until they had been vaccinated. The employees brought an interlocutory action pursuant to Article 700 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, and the Judge confirmed the full legitimacy of the employer’s measure by reason of the legislation on health and safety at work, as well as with reference to the provisions of recent decree-law no. 44/2021, albeit this provision came into force after occurrence of the facts of the case. The logical-legal reasoning of the Judge is based on Article 20 of Italian Legislative Decree 81/2008 (so-called  Consolidated Law on Safety) which, according to the Judge’s interpretation, imposes on the employee a legally relevant obligation of care and safety for the protection of his own psycho-physical integrity and of that of all third parties with whom he comes into contact at work, with the ensuing legal punishability of any non-compliant behaviour. To take a different view, and thus exclude such duty to cooperate on the part of the employee, would – as the Judge held – weaken the safety obligation which, under Article 2087 of the Italian Civil Code, is imposed on the employer. Hence, based on the analysis of the aforementioned rules, the law creates a system in which the employer and the employee are active players who are required to cooperate actively in creating a healthy and safe working environment. Given this premise, the trial when continued with the analysis of whether or not the employee was required to cooperate in terms of safety also where the precautionary measure to be adopted was vaccination.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…