Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Cassazione, ferie


16 Oct 2020

The Supreme Court reaffirms the right to the inalienability of holidays/annual leave (Guida al Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 16 October 2020 – Vittorio De Luca and Antonella Iacobellis)

Supreme Court no. 13613/2020 stated that: “The right of employee to paid annual leave must be considered a fundamental principle of EU social law, which cannot be derogated from and whose implementation by the competent national authorities can only be carried out within the limits explicitly indicated by Directive 2003/88. It is not compatible with art. 7 of the aforementioned directive, a national legislation that provides for an automatic loss of the right to paid annual leave, not subject to prior verification that the worker has actually had the possibility to exercise this right, in fact the employee must be considered the weak party in the employment relationship. work, so that it is necessary to prevent the employer from having the right to impose a restriction on his rights “.

Therefore, the non-payment of a financial allowance for the annual leave not taken at the time of the termination of the employment relationship would not only be in conflict with

  • Article 7 “Annual leave” of Directive 2003/88 according to which: “1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that each employye benefits from paid annual leave of at least 4 weeks, according to the conditions for obtaining and granting national practices. 2. The minimum period of paid annual leave cannot be replaced by a financial allowance, except in the event of termination of the employment relationship.“;
  • but also with Article 36 Italian Constitution: “The worker has the right to a remuneration proportionate to the quantity and quality of his work and in any case sufficient to ensure a free and dignified existence for himself and his family. The maximum duration of the working day is established by law. The worker has the right to weekly rest and paid annual leave, and cannot renounce them ”.


Source: Guida al lavoro de Il Sole 24 ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…