Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Interviews

Tag: Direttiva UE, trasparenza salariale


13 Jan 2026

Salaries: transparency among colleagues becomes mandatory — for equal roles, comparisons between pay slips are now allowed (Corriere Della Sera – Vittorio De Luca, 13 January 2026)

Transposition of the directive by 6 June. Europe says no to the Netherlands, which had requested a postponement. Talks between social partners and the Ministry of Labour

Italy has until 6 June to transpose the EU directive on pay transparency. To the Netherlands, which had asked for a delay, Brussels responded on 18 December with a firm “no.”

Reversal of the burden of proof

Everyone will be entitled to ask what the average pay is of colleagues—women and men—performing work of equal value. The directive provides for a reversal of the burden of proof: it will be up to companies to explain the reasons for pay that is lower than the average. In the event of a dispute, the directive envisages an internal company conciliation mechanism involving trade unions and equality bodies. If this proves insufficient, the matter may be taken to court.

The Ministry of Labour is working on transposing the directive through a legislative decree, with technical support from Inapp. A first meeting has been held with trade unions, followed by a second with all social partners. “We expect that associations like ours, which have direct knowledge of these issues, will also be consulted,” says Vincenzo Di Marco, Lombardy vice-president of Aidp, the association of HR directors.

Positions at the Ministry of Labour negotiating table

At the first meeting of the discussion table at the Ministry of Labour, Confindustria—aligned with the other employers’ associations—put forward two requests. The first was to uphold everything already set out in sectoral collective agreements regarding job grades and roles of equal value. The second was to enhance conciliation procedures in order to minimise litigation before the courts. Overall, these are requests with which the trade unions also largely agree.

Continue reading the full version published on Corriere della Sera.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…