Categories: News


28 Dec 2015

Part-time option in the final years on the job (Il Sole 24 Ore – Il Quotidiano del Lavoro, 29 December 2015)

Article written by Vittorio De Luca and Federica Parente

The Stability Law for 2016 introduces a special system which allows workers, if they meet certain requirements, to reduce their work hours benefiting from an imputed contribution proportional to the remuneration corresponding to the work not performed. In addition, for this cut in hours the employee will receive a sum from his/her employer, exempted from taxation and social security contributions, corresponding to the contribution for pension purposes related to the unperformed work. The requirements This opportunity is reserved for workers in the private sector, registered with the general obligatory social security scheme or alternative forms, hired with a full-time open-ended contract who:

• by the end of 2018 will have the right to retire based on age; • have already met the minimum contribution requirements; • reduce their work hours between 40% and 60% hours for a period of time not greater than the period between the date of granting of the benefit and the date the worker is eligible for retirement.

The reduction of work hours must be the subject to a specific agreement with the employer who is required to inform Inps and the territorial employment office of the stipulation of the contract and relative granting of such which will be clarified with the Decree of the Ministry of Labour to issue by 1 March 2016.

However the legislator has already explained that the reduction in hours must be authorised by the territorial employment office and the benefit will be granted by Inps within the limits of the resources earmarked by the same Stability Law (60 million in 2016 and 2018, 120 million in 2017).

It should be noted that for the purposes of the imputed contribution, the Stability Law for 2016 expressly refers to paragraph 6 of article 41 of the Legislative Decree 148/2015  containing the provisions for an overhaul of the social shock absorbers in terms of employment. Consequently, for the purposes of identifying the remuneration to use as a basis for the calculation, the number of weeks worked part-time must be considered as neutralised. This is the only common point with another provision of a law also aimed at providing incentives to reduce the work hours of employees nearing retirement age. The Jobs Act, with article 41 of Legislative Decree 148/2015, for companies which apply job-creation contracts, allow employees whose age is not more than 2 years before retirement and who have accrued the minimum amount of contributions, to obtain their pension if they accept to perform a job of a duration not more than half of the work hours prior to the reduction as per their collective contract. This arisen from the change in their job occurring within a year after the job-creation contract is stipulated and based on clauses that require an increase in employment for the greater reduction in hours. To this end the Stability Law, with the paragraph 285, introduced the possibility that the employer, bilateral entities or solidarity funds pay the contribution for pension purposes correlated to the remuneration lost by workers who do not access part time pension.

The origins of the intervention Lastly, it should be noted that part time pre-retirement originated from a 2012bill proposed by Senator Treu which included a sort of intergenerational job creation contract consisting in tax and contribution breaks for the employer for hiring young people as a consequence of the reduction in hours. Compared to the subsidised part time of the Jobs act and Treu’s bill, the Stability law does not include any obligation or incentive for employment for the employer in order to grant the benefit. Therefore, the new option constitutes an interesting instrument that lets the employer reduce the cost for employees nearing retirement age but still allows them to benefit from the experience that the workers have acquired over the years. The legislation also seems to be popular with the affected workers who can perform their jobs at a pace better suited to their age by using the imputed contribution for the work they do not perform.

Source:

Il Sole 24 OreIl Quotidiano del Lavoro

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

27 Feb 2026

Dismissals: the Corte costituzionale grants broader discretion to judges and greater scope for reinstatement (I Focus del Sole 24 Ore, 26 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

The regulation of dismissals continues to represent one of the central pillars of Italian labour law, an area of constant tension between freedom of economic initiative and the…

27 Feb 2026

“Food delivery” once again at the center of inspection activities (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto de Il Sole 24 Ore, 17 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandro Ferrari)

It was recently reported that one of the leading food delivery operators in Italy has been placed under judicial supervision, ordered by an urgent decree of the Public…

26 Feb 2026

Vittorio De Luca at the Welfare & HR Summit 2026

On February 25, 2026, Vittorio De Luca took part in the sixth edition of the Welfare & HR Summit organized by Il Sole 24 Ore. In particular, our…

26 Feb 2026

Italian Supreme Court: the risk assessment document (DVR) as a condition for the lawful use of staff leasing

The absence of a concrete and specific risk assessment, formalised in an adequate Risk Assessment Document (i.e. “Documento di Valutazione dei Rischi” - DVR) bearing a certified date,…

26 Feb 2026

Loss of chance: the Italian Supreme Court reiterates the strict burden of proof borne by the employee

With Order no. 1235 of 20 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court reiterated the fundamental principles governing compensation for loss of chance in employment matters, with particular reference…

26 Feb 2026

Did you know that… an employee who executes a bank transfer following a phishing email may be dismissed and ordered to compensate the employer for the loss?

With order no. 43873 of 13 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court - Labor Division - held that the dismissal for just cause of an employee working in…